Another Hard Night, But A Point

After around four days of licking our wounds, last night was as everyone agreed about bouncing back, showing a reaction, ideally getting the win but at least stopping any rot. At this stage of the season nobody can be sure about what ‘back on track’ looks like. West Ham took just two points from their first three games, including a famous defeat, yet before last night’s games sat at the top of the league. We aren’t sure whether to focus on three wins and just one defeat in five or one point from two away games and our own bubble being burst. A win and we could find ourselves back in first place, second at worst (given some not playing); a draw and it’s still a decent start; defeat and we’re getting gloomy again. What was not in doubt was that we would need a very good performance to beat a QPR side enjoying their own good start.

We got a decent performance and a hard-earned point. For the second time in three games we were up against a side hell-bent on keeping the ball – and to that extent QPR, like West Brom, succeeded, enjoying 70%-plus possession. That kept us pinned back in our own half, kept our forward-looking players focused on defending and running around trying to close down their opposite number. But, also like West Brom, who did actually score a goal against us, QPR largely failed to turn dominant possession into goalscoring opportunities. For that they may point to injuries of their own, but one curled shot just wide, two dangerous low balls across our box, and a one-on-one resulting from our mistake is not much return.

We defended very well, even towards the end when a number were not surprisingly flagging, and might even have won but for a debatable offside, a penalty not awarded, and a blatant pull back not even punished by a free-kick (and yellow card). But truth be told we struggled through the game to keep and make use of the ball and were down to the bare bones in terms of available players, limiting our ability to freshen things up, especially once Leaburn did not return for the second half. And at the end I’d guess both teams and managers were, if not ecstatic, reasonably satisfied with the draw.

The team would again be about whether one or two more might be available and, if not, how to manage/shuffle a squad of 25 (with Burke not on the final list submitted to the EFL) reduced to in effect 17 with seven injured and another (McNamara) unavailable. While the team for Stoke included a large element of resting players (and we paid the price), two home games surely meant best available starting if they could walk. Jones opted for just two actual changes, really three in practise as McNamara would have been right-back but for his suspension, so Mesik continued in that spot, Jones, Bindon and Bell the other three. Coventry returned to partner Skipp as the defensive midfield pairing, Ouma back among the subs, and Carey starting again in the central position of the more forward three, Rankin-Costello dropping to the bench. On the bench there would be no place for Apter, with Laqeretabua and Nkeng preferred.

As at Stoke we started the game brightly. From an early corner Leaburn managed to get his head to the ball but under pressure put it wide, Campbell had a shot blocked having been played in by Leaburn. But as QPR settled into their game the balance shifted in their favour as we saw less and less of the ball, especially in their half. They were to win nine corners in the first half and from one of them a curler from the edge of our area went only just wide with Okonkwu probably beaten. But in terms of near misses that was about it, QPR’s cause not helped by their dangerous winger going off injured. And the pendulum did shift back at the end of the half.

On 38 minutes, with QPR pressing forward Skipp wrongfooted them and slide through a perfectly weighted pass for TC to spring onto. He didn’t need to take a touch before planting it beyond their keeper and into the net, only for the offside flag to cut short our celebrations. It was to say the least very tight, have to see yet more replays before any definitive answer is possible, but he may have been onside. And there was still time for the ref to not award us a penalty. We were applying late pressure, the ball bouncing around their box, and Mesik chased one down. The QPR defender slipped/fell/was pushed and went to ground and in doing so brought Mesik down with him. If no foul had been given against Mesik it was surely a penalty, however unintended. But we are not exactly getting the breaks from the officials at the moment.

So at half-time, although the stats looked poor, we felt a goal was possible and that would change the game. But a few minutes before the break there was a confusing episode as Rankin-Costello appeared stripped off and ready to come on. The assumption was it would be for Carey, but why make such a move so close to half-time, with such a change then surely likely to seriously damage his confidence. Rankin-Costello sat down again and the mystery was resolved when he came on at the start of the second half but for Leaburn, who had obviously picked up a knock.

Rather than opting for his only replacement, Mbick, Jones the Boss chose to change the formation, switching to a back three/five with Rankin-Costello and Mesik wing-backs, while Grant and Campbell would operate up front. The change really didn’t work (at West Brom switching to that set-up did help to get us a point). We looked vulnerable on their left side and did come under the cosh. On 55 minutes the first of two dangerous low crosses flashed across our box, only needing a touch, and on 61 minutes Bindon lost the ball and they played their guy in for a run in on Okonkwo. Fortunately he stood tall and managed to get a leg in the way of the eventual effort.

On 63 minutes we abandoned the formation change as Mbick replaced Carey. And back out left TC began to cause them problems. As they tired we had more joy on the break but were stopped by cynical fouls. Grant intercepted the ball but was held back. Amid all this QPR were still controlling possession but we covered well. They brought on three subs on 77 minutes to fresh things up, which did not bode well for the run-in as we were tiring too.

On 83 minutes the second of their dangerous crosses was drilled in, from the right, again nobody getting the vital touch. Muamba came on for Skipp and on 87 minutes on another day we might have had another penalty as a QPR defender’s upper arm blocked a shot, but it was from close range. Would have been very soft. Ali replaced an exhausted Campbell and in the first of three stoppage time minutes we might have won the game, only for the ref to bottle it again. Mbick broke well with the ball and played it through for Grant. He was obviously held back and couldn’t reach the ball, the ref doing nothing. The final act of the game was a corner for us, but it came to nothing and it would be a point apiece.

The injuries, fixture list, and officials’ decisions are doing us no favours at present. We will go again at home to Portsmouth on Saturday, hoping that Leaburn’s withdrawal was precautionary (Mbick is a great prospect but still returning from his lengthy injury) and that perhaps some of the other injured will be available. If not some of our number will end Saturday thinking they might be extras from ‘They Shoot Horses Don’t They?’.

Ref Plays Starring Role For Stoke

After a good point away in midweek, which may have ended the 100% record but kept us unbeaten, today was going to be a hard one to call, for several reasons. How would the team be shuffled with tired legs to consider (with two games next week as well)? Would Stoke’s defence be weak, considering nine conceded in four games but a clean sheet (and their first win) last time out? And of course who would get the breaks on the day? The answer to the last question was Stoke, aided and abetted by a truly dreadful performance from the match officials.

The referee’s inadequacies began with the softest of penalties given in the 15th minute, after a very bright start to the game from us, progressed through various errors in decisions, ridiculous yellow cards (given in our case and not given in theirs, the ref falling for Stoke’s histrionics and ignoring their cynicism), and culminated in a second yellow and a red for McNamara when the first was the result of a situation which should not have arisen (everyone saw it was a Charlton corner) and the second a misinterpretation/overreaction to a gesture towards a Stoke player not even being spoken to for yet another scything down of Leaburn. Along the way we conceded three more goals, the result of a lack of understanding and coordination and dreadful bad luck (their second came as a clearance hit Grant and rebounded to their guy to shoot home, their fourth as a shot going wide was deflected in by a guy who knew little about it).

We contributed to our defeat with changes that left too many untested combinations in key areas and a poor reaction to going behind from the penalty. It made it one of those games – like Southampton at home last season – when you have to take it on the chin, metaphorically kick the cat, drink lots of red wine, go to sleep and wake up looking ahead to Wednesday night.

Putting together a team after Wednesday’s exertions was always going to be challenging – and several changes were made. In defence McNamara was moved to the bench and Mesik came in at right-back, with Jones and Bindon the central pairing and Bell at left-back. The defensive midfield two were both changed, with Coventry and Mwamba on the bench, replaced by newcomers Skipp and Ouma. Obviously a gamble but perhaps a necessary one. The more forward three were also adjusted, with Rankin-Costello’s sub cameos earning him a start, with Campbell and Grant either side of him, while Leaburn would continue as the lone striker. With no sign of any on the injured list, the bench had a lopsided feel to it, with McNamara the only defensive cover, Coventry and Mwamba available for defensive midfield, then Carey, Knibbs, Ali and Apter all possibles for the three, Mbick being Leaburn’s back-up/late replacement. It all came across as an element of needs must, but we just had to trust Jones’ assessment of who was most in need of a rest.

We did start brightly. TC skinned their guy on the left but stumbling into the box couldn’t deliver a telling final ball, then several half-chances came and went from a set-piece on seven minutes, with shots blocked and the ball just not quite dropping well for us. On 12 minutes Stoke did have a dangerous shot deflected over for a corner. And from that corner the game changed. Ouma was wrestling with his guy, both of them pulling and pushing. Ball in, their guy goes to ground, and the ref is conned. If that was a penalty there would have to be 20 given every game. Their guy scored.

That was when we needed to calm things down, get control of the game again. Instead we looked all at sea as Stoke not surprisingly were galvanised and the crowd got behind them – and the ref continued to lend them a helping hand. On 17 minutes Leaburn was cynically fouled to prevent him advancing, no yellow given. Then a clear Stoke handball was ignored, their guy moving forward after that and getting a free-kick. On 21 minutes Stoke extended their lead as a ball into our box was kicked clear by Ouma only for it to rebound off an unsuspecting Grant. It could have gone anywhere but dropped nicely for their guy to have the time to pick his spot, shooting low into the net on Okonkwu’s right side.

Bad went to much worse on 24 minutes. And this goal has to go down to our poor defending. A guy down their left put in a decent cross. Jones had moved to the near post to cover something and behind him Bindon was slow to sense the danger, allowing a free header. The two looked at each other after the ball was headed into the net. They can’t be expected to get everything right as a pairing after just one game together and this one cost us badly.

Jones the Boss reacted with a change after that goal, with McNamara coming on, surprisingly for Campbell. Perhaps he was felt to be in need of a rest, but didn’t look injured. Perhaps it was just tactical as we switched to a back three/five and pushed Grant up alongside Leaburn.

As half-time drew near you felt that if we could just get a goal from somewhere the whole momentum of the game could shift and we could go in at the break with something to play for. Instead another goal came but for them. We didn’t deal well with a Stoke attack down the right side and although a low cross was kicked away it went to a guy in space inside our box. His low shot was going wide before it took a deflection off another Stoke player. It really summed up the first half and slammed the door shut to any second-half rally. There was still time for the ref to ignore a blatant bad foul on Jones, the Stoke forward not looking at the ball but just intent on delivering a cheap shot on a guy getting booed by the home fans for some unfathomable reason. It was more than a yellow, nothing was given. Instead the ref booked Leaburn before calling an end to the half.

At the break Coventry was brought on for Ouma. Pairing him and Skipp just hadn’t worked out. And pretty soon what was already a hopeless cause became a complete exercise in damage limitation as the ref intervened once more. On 46 minutes a Stoke defender played the ball back and it went well over the goalline before their keeper kicked it clear. Unbelievably a goalkick was given. From that Stoke launched an attack and McNamara found himself exposed and pulled a guy back, getting a yellow. No complaints about the eventual booking but it arose from a situation that simply shouldn’t have happened but for the officials’ incompetence. And just a few minutes later as Leaburn advanced down our left he was hacked down yet again. Ref makes no attempt to even talk to the Stoke player and as others arrived around the incident McNamara waved his arm in the direction of the Stoke player. This was interpreted as demanding a card and instead the yellow was brought out for McNamara and then the red. Simply appalling refereeing.

The rest of the game was a meaningless exercise. We were intent on picking up no more injuries and just seeing it out without more cards – which almost didn’t happen as Leaburn got into a tussle with a defender and Stoke again displayed their cynicism and gamesmanship by calling for a second yellow. At least the ref didn’t respond to that. Leaburn would be replaced by Mbick, Rankin-Costello by Ali, then Apter for Grant.

Some games nothing goes your way. Perhaps we went into it with a poor mindset, feeling sorry for ourselves having to play two away games up north in the space of a few days, compounded by the early kick-off. More fundamentally, the Jones-Bindon partnership is still being built and their misunderstanding cost us one goal today, while having Skipp and Ouma as the defensive midfield pairing was a step too far, a tough ask for both of them. We simply have to shrug off the afternoon and prepare for Wednesday night, because we need a rousing performance to put this one firmly to bed.

Good Point On A Tough Night

We all knew before this one that a draw would be a good result, although of course also that we needed a win to go back to the top - and we are getting greedy. What we were treated to was a gutsy performance against a side which prioritised retaining possession (which is not to say they made no use of it), leaving us for most of the game chasing shadows and struggling to make use of the ball when we had it, given West Brom’s effective press, obliging us to go long. That we came from behind to get something from the game (for the second time out of four so far) was thanks to a formation change and the subs’ impact, for which Jones takes credit, and disciplined defending, their goal being an unfortunate exception capping off a rather sloppy start to the second half.

The BBC labelled West Brom’s formation as a 4-4-2. In practise it was more like a 4-6-0 with a high press. That they ended up with 71% possession but just three shots on target is a fair reflection of the way they are playing the game. That’s not a criticism, like us they are reshaping and building after flirting with relegation last season. As they should, they play to their strengths. And their set-up can squeeze the life out of the opposition, preventing the back line from playing out of defence. That we didn’t buckle, changed formation from a 4-2-3-1 to a 3-5-2 and created a decent chance to level the game, is in turn to our credit.

The team was always going to throw up some tough choices for Jones. And there were changes, not all enforced. In front of Okonkwo would be McNamara, Jones, new boy Bindon and Bell, with Mesic, through no fault of his own, missing out in the contest for the left-back slot. The defensive midfield pairing would be Coventry and Mwamba, who has greatly impressed so far from the bench, with Chalobah not available (or risked), Skipp not yet considered, and Ouma not getting the nod. The three in front of them would be Campbell, Grant and Alli, as per the second half on Saturday, with Carey dropping to the bench alongside Knibbs and Rankin-Costello. Up front would be Leaburn with Mbick once more the only replacement, no sign yet of Godden or Kelman. Nkeng and Apter were also among the subs.

We started brightly but pretty soon they settled into their pattern, which we struggled to counter. We did have moments in the first half. In the first 10 minutes Ali intercepted a poor West Brom pass, fed Campbell on the left, and his dangerous low cross was blocked. Then on 22 minutes, after West Brom made a pig’s ear of a free kick in a dangerous position, we broke well, sent Leaburn into the channel, but he didn’t take the shot and the chance was lost. For them, despite all the possession, the only moment of danger was McNamara getting caught out and their guy in space on the left side of our box, Okonkwo saving his shot.

At the break the stats told their own story. West Brom with 72% possession and eight shots (only one on target) to our two (and zero). You felt we would need to find a way to play the game in their half, keep the defensive discipline, with the concern that if they did get their noses in front it could prove terminal.

What we didn’t need was a sloppy start to the second half, but that’s what we got, while they were lifted by a change and the introduction of a nippy winger. A McNamara error led to an early chance for them, with the guy’s curler deflected wide, then a little later good passing by them set up a guy inside the box, his shot well saved by Okonkwu.

Consequently it wasn’t that surprising that West Brom took the lead, on 58 minutes, although that it was from a corner – they had studiously avoided high balls into our box, knowing they were short in that department – was unexpected. The ball was swung in to around our far post. McNamara headed it out well enough, but it dropped to their guy around the edge of the box. Now it would normally have been McNamara’s area to cover, but he couldn’t be expected to head clear, land, then be able to close the guy down – and criminally nobody else in a red shirt realised the danger and moved to cover. As a result their guy had time to bring it down and pick his spot, burying a powerful drive beyond Okonkwu into the net.

It seems we had been on the point of making changes and they came straight after the goal. Mesik, Ouma and Rankin-Costello came on for Grant, Ali and Muamba. And with that we switched to a 3-5-2, with Bell moved inside and McNamara and Mesik becoming wing-backs, while TC also moved inside to give Leaburn some support.

The changes almost brought quick benefit as a long ball out of defence found Leaburn, who was cynically taken out but remarkably nothing was given. The officials made several errors, including confusing corners and goalkicks but more important missing two or three fouls on our players in good positions.

West Brom continued to threaten and nobody doubts that if they had scored again it would most likely have been game over. But a few shots didn’t find their mark or were blocked. And on 68 minutes we drew level, a goal fashioned from the formation change and the substitutes. Mesik won the ball and passed to Rankin-Costello, who drove forward. He then slid the ball back out wide for Mesik. His cross from the left was decent enough, but it seemed set to be headed clear before Leaburn managed to get in the way and keep the ball in the danger zone. It dropped for Campbell and he tucked it home with his left foot into the corner, beyond a despairing lunge or two.

West Brom were stung by that and now suddenly had a game to win that they thought might already be in the bag. And the remainder of the game, including just three minutes of stoppage time, was nip and tuck, might have gone either way. Mbick replaced a tired Leaburn after 79 minutes, on 88 Carey came on for Coventry. There was time for Mbick to intercept and get taken out with nothing given, but neither side could break the deadlock.

At the end no question we were the happier of the two. Did we deserve a draw? One of those where the stats say no (West Brom with 71% possession, 15 shots with three on target against our four and one) but we scored as many times as them, they can have no real complaints that they were unable to see out the game or add to their lead. The performance was far from perfect but mostly that was due to West Brom’s tactics. Against Derby we turned things around with a Jones header, against Preston with a change in personnel, and last night with a change in formation and the contribution of the subs. That points to flexibility and options, all of which is very positive.

Just want Ramsay, Edwards, Koumeito (sadly not likely Sichenje for some time), Chalobah, Godden and Kelman all back fit and chomping at the bit, plus Skipp settling in. I’ve no idea whether any of them will be available for Stoke on Saturday, or how Jones will shuffle the pack in view of tired legs and knocks. It will be another, different challenge. Stoke have conceded nine goals in four games, despite a clean sheet in their most recent one, so hopefully there will be gaps we can exploit. We go into the game with well-founded confidence.

Thanks So Much Greg

We all kinda knew this one was coming. The numbers didn’t stack up, especially after last night’s two additions. But confirmation that Greg Docherty would leave the club, after the cancellation of his contract by mutual consent, still leaves us with a heavy heart. The words of Nathan Jones and James Rodwell hit the spot. All we can do as fans is add our very heartfelt thanks to Doc for all he has done since signing for us. The stay wasn’t that long, the contribution immense, to say that we are in a better position from when he joined is a massive understatement. I just hope that wherever he ends up truly appreciates what an asset they are getting and that Greg really enjoys the next stage of his career.

Of the others who have left, temporarily or permanently, overall the news is positive. The Kaminski situation and outcome mystifies me, just have to wait for some clarification. But exactly why he and Jones fell out and why a 33-year-old goalkeeper, one on the fringes of the international picture, might choose to go to ply his trade in Cyprus is a puzzle. Perhaps he has personal reasons for the choice. In any event good luck to him, we can afford to be magnanimous as we very much like the cut of his replacement.

Joining him on the ‘out on loan’ front - along with Mitchell(Z), Gough, Laqeretabua, Ewens-Findley, Rylah, Olaofe and (strictly speaking) Ahadme (I think that’s all) - are Asiimwe, Fullah and Kanu. All the young ones at least clearly have a path back and we all hope that comes to pass, that they benefit and progress in the time away. The confirmation that Kanu actually has a year longer on his contract than thought, and the new contract for Fullah, indicate that they will remain very much in the club’s thoughts.

It merely remains to add that we all hope that Skipp, Nkeng and Bindon, along with the other eight new players, have very rewarding Charlton careers, as obviously we as fans would be the beneficiaries as well as the club. How quickly Bindon and Skipp in particular are introduced to the first team, potentially tonight, is of course up to Jones the Boss and how he sees things. There must be some temptation to leave the back four unchanged since Jones the Player and Bindon will no doubt need a little time to get used to each other and the back line was effective against Preston. Without Docherty and with Chalobah at least doubtful, there could be an early introduction for Skipp, depending on his fitness and whether Jones feels that Mwamba is ready to start a game. Either way, tonight’s line-up will have half an eye on Stoke away on Saturday and the demands on each player in turn.

It has been an excellent transfer window, we are materially stronger than we ended last season, despite the setback losing Koumetio and Sichenje at Spurs. Not getting Rak-Sakyi was a disappointment, but there is it, we wait to see how ready Nkeng might be and whether Alli and/or Apter step up and take their opportunity. The lone striker position is still stretched if only Leaburn and Mbick are available, hopefully Godden and Kelman will be back soon, then we will have options again in that position too (and contrary to popular opinion I’m confident that Godden or Kelman can play alone up front, provided the rest of the team – especially the three behind the one up front – react accordingly, looking to pick off a second ball instead of hoping they can win anything in the air or hold up play as well as Leaburn is currently doing).

We’ve made a great start, just now needs cementing with the two tough away fixtures, before two back at The Valley.

Not Often This Good

I don’t think I’ve ever before been in a more relaxed, positive mood going into the final day of a transfer window (please note anyone looking here for some nugget of ITK info will be disappointed). If we get one or two more in, including the obvious name, great; if we have to juggle the books and two or three depart, sad but also perfectly understandable. If we do nothing, as long as the squad numbers add up so be it, now that we have covered for the defensive injury calamity with the addition of Bindon. We have strengthened materially and tied down three of our most valuable assets to long-term contracts (and I also liked that Jones the Boss added that even so if they have the opportunity to move to the Premiership the club will not stand in their way). Oh, and did I forget to mention? We are top of the league.

Having watched the West Ham game from a hospital bed in Chalon, I managed to take in the Preston match in a Paris hotel room (having even found an HDMI lead in a nearby shop to rig up the lap-top with the room’s large TV, lovely jubbly), with my partner Suzanne having booked the weekend away before my recent problem and not quibbling about taking time out to watch the game.

Too late for any kind of match report, just a few observations. Clearly, as at home to Derby, we didn’t click in the first half, the only difference being we didn’t go behind. Our play was, as Jones acknowledged, just too sluggish and unadventurous, making it easy for a Preston back five to contain the threat. Against Derby we were rejuvenated by a Jones the Player header, this time around Jones the Boss didn’t wait and made the change at the break, withdrawing Carey for Alli and switching Grant into the more central role.

Carey. Let’s make some things clear, he has been a fantastic signing and is a key member of the team/squad. We are going to need him through this season and beyond, his driving with the ball and his goals. The only question right now for Jones and his team is whether or not he is our best option to start the game in the central position of the three (clearly he is not suited to either of the wider roles) or used as an impact substitute later on, when the opposition is more tired and gaps start to appear. There will be times we are chasing a game and need a goal. A fresh Carey coming off the bench would be one excellent option (IMO).

As stressed before, the change in our formation requires the central player in the three behind the front man to pick a pass and knit the three together. It’s a different skillset than Carey displayed last season. So either with practise he gets better at doing that, or he is kept in reserve for when during a game we need a different option and fresh legs.

It is not as if there are no alternatives. Grant switched inside on Saturday, Rankin-Costello has been used in the role, while Knibbs, the most obvious choice, seems out of favour. His performance against Spurs (and those of others) should count for nothing, while on the positive side in pre-season he linked up well with Grant in particular, signs of an immediate understanding.

For the three we currently have TC, Grant, Alli, Apter, Carey, Knibbs and Rankin-Costello. That is sufficient to mix and match. But if Rak-Sakyi were to join after all, surely Apter would have to find pastures new as Alli has only just come in. Equally, if Jones feels that Knibbs is fourth-choice for the central spot, behind Carey, Grant and Rankin-Costello, and does not intend to play him, so be it, he must have his reasons, but as things stand it’s a wasted squad position.

Of course we’re not getting over-excited about topping the league with a 100% record after three games. With away games at WBA and Stoke approaching, after five we will have a better idea – and after 10 games you can at least tell who has had a good start and who has not. Still nice though – and a better feeling than last season’s start, when we were cheered by the sight of us being competitive (before injuries took their toll). This time around we are giving the early impression of being capable of more than that.

It is very rare, for us for sure but probably for most clubs, for all to be in alignment: fans content with the ownership, the manager, and the team/squad, creating a virtuous circle. For me the last time was the brief period under the spivs (before they ran out of money and showed their real intentions, sacrificing us to the whims of Duchatelet) with Sir Chris in charge before and after promotion. Before that you have to go back to the Premiership years with Curbs and Murray. Then you have the set-up with the Return to The Valley. Just before that we had Lennie Lawrence and a terrific fighting team, but the ownership counted against perfect union. Long may this continue – although of course it cannot last indefinitely – and enjoy it.

Finally, a belated RIP Mike Bailey and condolences to his family and friends. Like many others I was just a little too young to remember his performances on the pitch, although I must have seen him play. I do remember being huddled around a radio with my father in February 1965 (bloody hell, that’s over 60 years ago) to hear news of our FA Cup fourth round replay at Middlesbrough. I still have the newspaper clipping in my scrapbook: ‘Mike Bailey breaks leg and out go Charlton’. He broke his leg in the 10th minute. He did return and went on to play 169 times for us, scoring 22 goals, before he moved on to Wolves in 1966 for £35k.

Bailey’s time as Charlton manager (1980-81), succeeding Andy Nelson, was marked by promotion back to the Second Division only for his prompt – and for me at least still very curious – replacement by Alan Mullery, who had ironically many years before replace Bailey in the England squad. It was a curious time, at the end of the Glickstein era, and I leave it to others to explain what really happened. Suffice to say, Bailey was a Charlton hero/legend.

Injuries Change The Picture

Jones the Boss described it as a “disaster” and he’s not being over-emotional. Unless the injuries to both Koumeito and Sichenje prove much less serious than initially feared, we went in 10 minutes from awaiting the icing on the cake signing of Rak-Sakyi, still basking in the glory of the win at West Ham, to having six days (including today) to make a lot of changes. And Jones has to put together a side, especially a defence, to keep the Championship momentum going against Preston on Saturday (with a trip to West Brom coming up on Wednesday).

As I understand it, with no inside knowledge, our current injury list now reads as Mannion, Ramsay, Edwards, Koumeito, Sichenje, Burke, Godden and Kelman. Add in the fact that Kaminski, Fullah and Kanu are currently persona non grata and you have 11 first-team squad members unavailable. That is a crisis.

Losing a centre-back in a game is unfortunate, but losing his back-up as well at the same time, and then learning that another of the senior centre-halves is out too, is downright unfair. I can’t remember being as gutted as this about losing a player through injury as I am about Koumeito. I thought he’d slotted in wonderfully well alongside Jones right from the off. The fact that we sold a centre-half, Mitchell(A), and sent another two, Gough and Mitchell(Z), out on loan were understandable moves at the time, but I hope somebody at the club is scanning the loan contracts to see if an immediate recall was included as an option (I assume not).

So, what are we – or rather Jones and his team – looking at as things stand for Saturday? Of course the goalkeeper spot is not an issue. In defence we have available McNamara (and just how good a signing is he proving to be), Jones, Bell, Mesic and Asiimwe. I don’t know enough about Preston’s attacking strengths to factor that in, but I’d assume that unless Ramsay or Edwards are ready to be put into the mix the only question would be whether to keep Mesic as Jones’ central partner, as last night, or move Bell inside and have Mesic as left-back.

As for options for a quick signing, the obvious one to me – and I’ve no idea regarding viability – is to go back to Wrexham and ask if we can have Coady back, immediately. He knows the place, the set-up, and most of the squad, and this time we’d have him play alongside Jones. As and when players may return, he would be an extra option either in defence or midfield. As for Rak-Sakyi, if the rumours are true and Burnley have trumped our offer, unfortunate but accept that and move on quickly; if JRS has the balls to tell his agent 'no, I want to go to Charlton, do the deal', we would all be delighted. 

Just where another senior addition leaves the squad numbers I’m not sure. But we clearly have to get the Kaminski sale done before the window closes, to get loan deals for Fullah and possibly others, and to sort out which from Asiimwe, Burke (clearly now more complicated), Apter, Knibbs, Kanu, possibly others, are moved on. I don’t want to see any of them go. We’ve not seen the best yet of Knibbs or Apter, Kanu and Asiimwe are still developing with potential. But the rules are the rules and something has to give. All we can do is watch and wait.

Thank You

The lot of most football fans (obvious exclusions being Spanners and Palarce supporters, whose lot is too awful to contemplate, and Gooners, who can only ever hope at best to have their expectations fulfilled, never exceeded, leaving them miserable most of the time) is pretty similar. There are ups and downs, even spells where you might start to wonder whether it is all worth the commitment as the disappointments mount and appear permanent. But then there are the good times, moments that you wouldn’t swap for all the proverbial tea in China – at least I wouldn’t.

Every Addick can rattle off our glorious moments and their stories of the incident/game/season. And to the list we can now add away at West Ham in August 2026 (for the record I was at Upton Park in 1986 for Jim Melrose’s goal and the 3-1 win). That might seem an exaggeration to some, but please cut me some slack. I was taken into a French hospital via A&E on Wednesday, had a few very difficult days (all good enough now, let home today but wobbly), but by midday Saturday the tubes had been taken out and I was able with the help of my partner Suzanne to rig up a lap-top to watch the game on CATV. And what we were served up with gave us a reminder why we are Addicks. A performance of heart and resolve, with serious attacking intent thrown in, and a victory to warm the cockles of the heart of every Addick. For that, in the circumstances, all I can say to the players and management, is a very heartfelt thank you.

Let’s get the Hammers’ side of things out of the way first. The Leeds guy with the post-match diatribe got it pretty much spot-on. I commented after the game that West Ham – with the exception of Bowen - had been sloppy, complacent and arrogant and deserved everything they got. Of course its early in the season, they are still gelling, good time to play them etc. And of course on another day we don’t begin the game with an overhead kick goal from a central defender and they don’t finish it with a penalty miss. But they so badly lacked drive and leadership on the pitch, moving the ball sluggishly – even though they had ample evidence that when they did speed things up they not surprisingly threatened. All the heroes on the pitch were in our new away kit.

I found it odd that their manager Nuno Espirito Santo commented that “we got punished from situations we knew Charlton would create problems from”. So, if you knew how, where and why we would cause problems how did you set up your team to head off such problems? Or did you – and/or the players – just not bother? Just assume that there would be too much firepower to outbalance anything we might throw at them. West Ham were punished from a throw-in and a centre-back getting caught in possession. Fact is, through the game West Ham mustered a free header just before half-time, a couple of efforts that Okonkwo saved well, one goal, and a fortuitous penalty at the death (unlike Steve Brown and the rest of the CATV crew I thought the ref had no choice but to give it, however harsh and unfair on the excellent Coventry). Set that against two scored and at least half a dozen situations where we were almost in. Jones the Boss was right, we deserved our luck at the end.

Okonkwu had an excellent debut. Jones the Talisman was top-drawer but so too were his accomplices, Koumetio, McNamara and Bell. It’s not a back four which many of us would have predicted a few weeks ago, but one which has got off to a great start, helped for sure by the astute Chalobah (please can he stay fit!) and Coventry, who is benefiting from not having to focus just on clearing the lines. Assuming Mannion stays (and Kaminski departs), to that six in front of Okonkwu the current back-ups are another six: Ramsay and Edwards, as and when they are available again, Burke, Mesik (who is still recovering from Blackett-Taylor having skinned him), Sichenje and Asiimwe. You assume that if suitable bids come in Burke and Asiimwe will depart (and if they do they go with all best wishes); if they do, we really do need Ramsay and Edwards back available at least for when the injuries and suspensions start.

Coventry and Chalobah are so far nailing down the two defensive midfield spots. The alternatives would seem to be Docherty, Ouma (of whom we so far know very little), Rankin-Costello and Mwamba, with Captain Doc so far not involved. Here too you feel we can mix and match to some extent but struggle with any sustained absence through injury.

The three in front of them – in my view the powerhouse of the team – is not yet settled but looking full of promise. Some people wonder what has happened to galvanise TC, but the answer seems clear: ask him to play in a role which maximises his abilities and don’t ask him to switch from front two, winger (on either side), and wing-back. He can switch sides with Grant but as a matter of choice. Add in Alli and Apter and we have options on either side. The enigma is the central role, currently held by Carey. He’s been a great signing and you hope he will grow into the different role being asked of him compared with last season. I still suspect that as things stand Knibbs could offer more when it comes to knitting together the three. But that’s for Jones to decide, it’s another area where we have good options, especially if you include Rankin-Costello. Those options would of course increase if a certain Rak-Sakyi appears on the scene.

For the one up top, Godden joining Kelman on the unavailable list did hurt us yesterday. Leaburn came in and was outstanding, the best game I can remember him having for us, effective and an unsolved problem for them throughout. But he had to leave the field on 70 minutes and his departure clearly affected our play. Mbick is clearly a great prospect and it’s enormously encouraging to see him back playing the game after his long injury. But it was an enormous ask. If I have one minor criticism of yesterday it was that perhaps Jones could have come up with a different option than asking Mbick to do what Leaburn had been doing for the final 20+ minutes away at West Ham, with Alli and Apter on the bench. I don’t know what the situation is with Kanu. That said, there were so many exhausted players on the pitch at the end that we were going to be under the cosh late on whatever Jones did.

The 4-2-3-1 formation is so far working a treat. Slipping into a back 3/5 late in the game to defend a lead seems reasonably unproblematic, given the players available. The question is how do we switch as and when we need to chase a game? With Dykes having gone somewhere else, we need forwards on the bench not just to replace a tiring one up top but also to be able to switch to say a 4-4-2 with the wingers. Hopefully Godden and Kelman will both be back shortly and at least we have the numbers, even if Kanu remains frozen out.

So, there was a very happy hospital room in Chalon-sur-Saone on Saturday afternoon and the grin hasn’t faded yet. Just how Jones fashions a side to go out and compete against Spurs on Wednesday night I haven’t the faintest idea. In other circumstances it would have been reasonable to anticipate us putting out close to a first-choice squad and Tottenham to pick from their reserves. But with them having been humbled at Brentford and needing match-practise and us with an exhausted group of players and a match at home to Preston on Saturday to prepare for, perhaps the reverse will be the case. Who cares? It’s a bonus.